What starts out as an entertaining night out for a concert with friends, ends with painful injuries. Instead of enjoying your favorite music with companions, you must go to the hospital to treat injuries sustained due to negligent maintenance of the concert venue. You are now recovering from your injuries and are faced with medical expenses. You know that you shouldn’t be responsible for the medical bills; after all, you are hurt because someone failed to do their job. But who exactly is responsible? Determining the party responsible for personal injuries was a recent issue in a case out of Baton Rouge.
In March of 2006, Ms. Shannon Rodrigue went to a concert with her friends at the Riverside Performing Centroplex in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. As Ms. Rodrigue and her friends waited in line to enter the Centroplex, a Spectator Management Group (“SMG”) employee instructed the group to go around the side of the building and go down a flight of stairs in order to get their seats. As the group proceeded to head down the stairs, Ms. Rodrigue missed a step and fell down the flight of stairs. The fall was the result of a poorly lit stairwell. Ms. Rodrigue sustained several injuries to her head, back, neck, knees, and wrists.
Ms. Rodrigue filed a lawsuit against several parties whom she believed were responsible for the poorly lit stairwell that ultimately led to her injuries. The parties included the Centroplex, the Centroplex’s insurer, and the City of Baton Rouge-Parish of East Baton Rouge; SMG and its insurer. In response to Ms. Rodrigue’s filing of the lawsuit, SMG and its insurer filed a motion to have Ms. Rodrigue’s lawsuit against them dismissed. SMG asserted that Ms. Rodrigue had no claim against them and their insurance company because they did not have custody of the stairwell where Ms. Rodrigue fell. SMG further claimed that even though Ms. Rodrigue and her friends were directed to the stairwell by one of its employees, SMG was not aware of the lighting situation of the stairwell before her fall. The District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge granted SMG’s motion and Ms. Rodrigue’s claims against it were dismissed. Ms. Rodrigue appealed to the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal.
In Louisiana, the law states that a party is responsible for damages resulting from one’s own acts and for damages caused by things within one’s custody. La. C.C. art. 2317. Louisiana law also states that an owner or person having custody of property has a duty to keep the property in reasonably safe condition. The duty includes fixing hazardous conditions or giving guests warnings concerning the potential danger. See Graupmann v. Nunamaker Family Ltd., 136 So. 3d 863, 867 (La. Ct. App. 2013).
The key to SMG’s responsibility for the stairwell depended on whether or not they possessed custody over the stairwell. Louisiana considers two factors when determining whether a thing is in one’s custody. First, the courts consider whether a person has the right of direction and control over the thing. The court must then determine whether the party derives any benefit from the thing. See Davis v. Riverside Court Condominium Assc. Phase II, Inc., 652 So. 2d 590, 592 (La. Ct. App. 2014). There is a sensible presumption that an owner has custody of his property, however, this presumption can be rebutted by a contractual obligation for another party to maintain and control the property. See Doughty v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co., 576 So. 2d 461, 454 (La. 1991).
In this case, the City was the owner of the Centroplex but contracted with SMG to manage the arena, exhibition hall, and the performing arts theater. However, in their contractual agreement, the City remained responsible for the maintenance of the exterior areas which specifically included grounds, driveways, pavement, ramps, and steps. The Court of Appeal determined that the contract between the City and SMG clearly did not transfer management of the stairwell where Ms. Rodrigue fell because it was an exterior area under the management, control, and custody of the City. The Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s ruling dismissing Ms. Rodrigue’s claims of custodial liability against SMG. However, the Court of Appeal remanded the case back to the District Court, because Ms. Rodrigue also asserted claims of general negligence and respondeat superior, which did not get full consideration by the District Court.
Claims for personal injuries are surprisingly complex and difficult. Ensuring that you are fully and justly compensated for injuries caused by the fault of others requires the assistance of the very best attorneys.
Additional Sources: SHANNON M. RODRIGUE VERSUS THE BATON ROUGE RIVER CENTER D/B/ A RIVERSIDE PERFORMING CENTROPLEX, ET AL.
Written by Berniard Law Firm Blog Writer: Jesse Congo
Additional Berniard Law Firm Articles on Louisiana Slip and Fall Injuries: Woman Awarded No Damages For Slip and Fall Accident at Nail Salon in Baton Rouge