Does a Letter from Lessor to Lessee Constitute Proper Notice for Termination of Lease?

apartment-architectural-design-architecture-1693946-1024x736Lease agreements are important documents that specify the rights and obligations of both lessor and lessee. Specifically, termination of leases must follow specified procedures and the tenant must be given adequate notice before leases can be terminated. That being said, does a letter from the lessor to the lessee constitute proper notice for termination of a lease? The Fourth District Court of Appeals of Louisiana recently held that a tenant was not given proper notice for termination of his lease and therefore, the termination was not valid.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Kenneth Lobell, plaintiff, suffered extensive damage to property that he leased from Cathy Rosenberg and 2025 Canal St., L.L.C. On December 28, 2007, Rosenberg sent a letter to Lobell stating that he had defaulted on certain lease payments for a three-story building located on 2025 Canal Street. Rosenberg subsequently sent letters on January 31, 2007 and February 12, 2008 regarding these defaulted payments. The letters also stated her desire to terminate the lease. After a bench trial, the trial court judge held that there was a proper termination of the lease and Mr. Lobell owed certain costs and back payments to Rosenberg and 2025 Canal St., L.L.C.

The Fourth District Court of Appeals of Louisiana disagreed with the trial court and held that the lease was not properly terminated. Because leases are contracts between lessor and lessee, they afford certain rights and obligations to each party. See La. C.C. 2668. Lessees must pay rents for the property according to the terms of the lease agreement, among other obligations. See La. C.C. 2683. When a lessee does not pay rent, a lessor has two options: 1) obtain a money judgment based on the amount owed or 2) cancel the lease. See Richard v. Broussard 495 So.2d 1291, 1293 (La. 1986). To terminate a lease, the lessor must follow specific eviction procedures. These procedures include giving a five-day notice to vacate, followed by judicial procedures to effectuate an eviction. See La. C.C.P. art. 4701; see also La. C.C.P. 4731; see also La. C.C.P. 4733.

The appellate court held that three letters sent by the defendant to plaintiff did not constitute proper notice for eviction proceedings. The lease agreement provided two ways to terminate the lease: 1) by written notice of default and 2) lessee failure to cure or remedy said default within 30 days or a reasonable period of time after giving notice of default. Each party was bound by this agreement. See CA One/ Pampy’s v. Brown, 982 So.2d 909, 915 (La. Ct. App. 2008). Here, the letters were only part of the required process and not sufficient on their own. Additionally, the letters did not specify or provide any type of cure period for the plaintiff. Viewed as a whole, the statements did not amount to a statement that the parties no longer intended to honor the lease or allow the lessor an opportunity to cure the defaults. Therefore, the court held that the trial court erred in terminating the lease.

The terms of a lease agreement are important and must be followed. When a landlord wishes to terminate a lease, he must ensure that eviction procedures proscribed by law and specified in the lease agreement are followed.

Additional Sources: Lobell v. Rosenberg

Written By Berniard Law Firm Blog Writer: George Emmons

Additional Berniard Law Firm Article on Leases: Citing Indemnity Provision, Court Attributes Liability on Lessee in Bastrop, Louisiana Slip and Fall